This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Original Research

Antipsychotic Exposure in Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: Empirical Insights From a Large Cohort Study

JiaHui Zeng, MDa; Andrea Raballo, PhDb,c; RanPiao Gan, MDa; GuiSen Wu, MDa; YanYan Wei, PhDa; LiHua Xu, PhDa; XiaoChen Tang, PhDa; YeGang Hu, PhDa; YingYing Tang, PhDa; Tao Chen, PhDd,e; ChunBo Li, PhDa; JiJun Wang, PhDa,f,g,‡; and TianHong Zhang, MD, PhDa,*

Published: March 21, 2022


Objective: Current treatment guidelines for individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis do not recommend the prescription of antipsychotics (not even second-generation ones) as the first treatment option for preventing psychosis. Yet, recent meta-analytic evidence indicates that antipsychotic exposure in CHR is relatively widespread and associated with a higher imminent risk of transition to psychosis. Therefore, we undertook this study to better delineate which clinical characteristics of CHR individuals may lead to the choice of antipsychotic prescription and whether it identifies a subgroup at higher risk for conversion to psychosis.

Methods: Consecutively referred CHR individuals (N = 717) were assessed for demographic and clinical characteristics and followed up for 3 years (200 did not reach the end of the follow-up time) from 2016 to 2021. The sample was then dichotomized, on the basis of antipsychotic prescription, to prescribed (CHRAP+, n = 492) or not-prescribed (CHRAP–, n = 225) groups, which were subsequently compared for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The risks of conversion to psychosis in CHRAP+ versus CHRAP– groups were tested via survival analysis.

Results: Of the 717 CHR individuals, 492 (68.62%) were prescribed antipsychotics; among these antipsychotics, the highest proportion used was for aripiprazole (n = 152), followed by olanzapine (n = 106), amisulpride (n = 76), and risperidone (n = 64). The CHRAP+ group had younger age (t = 2.138, P = .033), higher proportion of female individuals (χ2 = 5.084, P = .024), psychotic symptoms of greater severity (t = 7.910, P < .001), and more impaired general function (t = 5.846, P < .001) than the CHRAP– group. The CHRAP+ group had greater risk for conversion to psychosis (27.0% in the CHRAP+ group vs 10.9% in the CHRAP– group, P < .001). Factors related to positive symptoms were the most likely to influence doctors’ decision-making regarding prescripton of antipsychotics, without influence of age, sex, and education levels.

Conclusions: Clinicians may prescribe antipsychotics mainly based on the severity of positive and disorganization symptoms of CHR individuals. The CHRAP+ group was associated with a higher risk of conversion to psychosis. In pragmatic terms, this finding indicates that baseline antipsychotic prescription in CHR cohorts is a warning flag for higher incipient risk of psychosis and designates as hyper-CHR subgroup as compared to antipsychotic-naive CHR.

Trial Registration: identifier: NCT04010864

Volume: 83

Quick Links:

Continue Reading…

Subscribe to read the entire article


Buy this Article as a PDF