This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Focus on Women's Mental Health

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Light Therapy for Antepartum Depression

Anna Wirz-Justice, PhD; Anja Bader, MS; Ulrike Frisch, MD; Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz, PhD; Judith Alder, PhD; Johannes Bitzer, MD; Irene Hösli, MD; Sandra Jazbec, PhD; Francesco Benedetti, MD; Michael Terman, PhD; Katherine L. Wisner, MD; and Anita Riecher-Rössler, MD

Published: April 5, 2011

Article Abstract

Objective: Affective disorder during pregnancy is a common condition requiring careful judgment to treat the depression while minimizing risk to the fetus. Following up on promising pilot trials, we studied the efficacy of light therapy.

Method: Twenty-seven pregnant women with nonseasonal major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV (outpatients, university polyclinic) were randomly assigned to 7,000 lux fluorescent bright white or 70 lux dim red (placebo) light administered at home in the morning upon awakening for 1 h/d in a 5-week double-blind trial carried out between October 2004 and October 2008. Clinical state was monitored weekly with the 29-item Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) with Atypical Depression Supplement (SIGH-ADS). Changes of rating scale scores over time were analyzed with the general linear model. Differences from baseline of SIGH-ADS and 17-item HDRS scores at every time point were the dependent variables, time was the within-subjects factor, and treatment was the between-subjects factor. The model also included baseline score of depression and gestational age at intervention start.

Results: The superiority of bright light over dim light placebo was shown for both SIGH-ADS (R2 = 0.251; F3,23 = 3.91; P < .05) and HDRS (R2 = 0.338; F3,23 = 5.42; P < .01) when analyzing the week-by-week change from baseline, and HDRS scores showed a significant interaction of treatment with time (F4,92 = 2.91; P < .05). Categorical analysis revealed that the response rate (HDRS ≥ 50% improvement) at week 5 was significantly greater for bright light (81.3%, n = 16) than for placebo light (45.5%, n = 11) (P < .05). Remission (final score ≤ 8) was attained by 68.6% versus 36.4%, respectively (P < .05). Expectation ratings did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: Bright white light treatment for 5 weeks improved depression during pregnancy significantly more than placebo dim red light. The study provides evidence that light therapy, a simple, cost-effective antidepressant modality with minimal side effects for the mother and no known risk for the unborn child, may be a useful nonpharmacologic approach in this difficult situation.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01043289

J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(7):986-993

Submitted: April 21, 2010; accepted August 20, 2010.

Online ahead of print: April 5, 2011 (doi:10.4088/JCP.10m06188blu).

Corresponding author: Anna Wirz-Justice, PhD, Centre for Chronobiology, Psychiatric Hospitals of the University of Basel, Wilhelm Klein Strasse 27, CH-4012 Basel, Switzerland (anna.wirz-justice@unibas.ch).

Volume: 72

Quick Links: Depression (MDD)

Continue Reading…

Subscribe to read the entire article

$40.00

Buy this Article as a PDF

References

Sign-up to stay
up-to-date today!

SUBSCRIBE

Already registered? Sign In

Original Research

Effect of Zuranolone on Concurrent Anxiety and Insomnia Symptoms in Women With Postpartum Depression

Zuranolone was associated with improvements in depressive and anxiety symptoms and was beneficial for insomnia and patient-perceived...

Read More...