This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Original Articles

Venlafaxine Versus Placebo in the Preventive Treatment of Recurrent Major Depression

Stuart A. Montgomery, MD; Richard Entsuah, PhD; David Hackett, MSc; Nadia R. Kunz, PharmD; and Richard L. Rudolph, MD; for the Venlafaxine 335 Study Group

Published: March 1, 2004

Article Abstract

Background: Major depression is often chronic and recurrent, yet most long-term therapeutic trials are not adequately designed to assess antidepressant efficacy in recurrence prevention. Long-term efficacy and safety of prophylactic venlafaxine treatment were evaluated in outpatients with recurrent major depression.

Method: Patients with a history of recurrent DSM-III-R major depression received open-label treatment with venlafaxine, 100 to 200 mg/day, for 6 months. Those who responded to treatment (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D21] score <= 12, day 56) and remained relapse-free (no more than 2 HAM-D21 scores > 10 and no Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness [CGI-S] score >= 4, months 2-6) either continued taking venlafaxine, 100 to 200 mg/day, or were switched in a double-blind fashion to placebo for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the number of patients experiencing a recurrence of major depression (CGI-S score >= 4). The cumulative probability of recurrence was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method of survival analysis. Data were collected from November 1992 through December 1995.

Results: Of the 235 patients who enrolled in the recurrence-prevention period, 225 (N = 109, venlafaxine; N = 116, placebo) provided efficacy data. Survival analysis determined a 22% cumulative probability of recurrence in venlafaxine-treated patients after 12 months compared with 55% for the placebo group (p < .001). More than twice as many placebo-treated patients (48%) as venlafaxine-treated patients (21%) discontinued treatment because of lack of efficacy (p < .001).

Conclusion: Twelve-month maintenance venlafaxine treatment was significantly more efficacious than placebo in preventing major depression recurrence in patients who had been successfully treated with venlafaxine for 6 months.

Volume: 65

Quick Links: Depression (MDD)

Continue Reading…

Subscribe to read the entire article

$40.00

Buy this Article as a PDF

References

Sign-up to stay
up-to-date today!

SUBSCRIBE

Already registered? Sign In

Original Research

Young-Adult Social Outcomes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

ADHD that persisted into young-adulthood was associated with poorer outcomes in terms of education, employment, and emotional...

Read More...