This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Original Research

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Desvenlafaxine Succinate in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

Nicholas A. DeMartinis, MD; Paul P. Yeung, MD, MPH; Richard Entsuah, PhD; and Amy L. Manley

Published: May 15, 2007

Article Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine succinate extended-release in major depressive disorder (MDD).

Method: Adult outpatients with DSM-IV-defined MDD were randomly assigned to desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day (N = 114), 200 mg/day (N = 116), or 400 mg/day (N = 113) or placebo (N = 118) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables included change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17, the primary efficacy measure), Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S), rates of response (>= 50% decrease from baseline HAM-D17 score) and remission (HAM-D17 score <= 7), and Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity overall score. The study was conducted from November 2003 to November 2004.

Results: At the final on-therapy evaluation, the mean HAM-D17 scores for desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day (12.75) and 400 mg/day (12.50) were significantly lower than for placebo (15.31; p = .0038 and p = .0023, respectively); for desvenlafaxine 200 mg/day, the mean score was 13.31 (p = .0764). CGI-I and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale results were significant for all groups; CGI-S results were significant with 100 mg/day and 400 mg/day. Response rates were significantly greater for desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day (51%) and 400 mg/day (48%) versus placebo (35%; p = .017 and p = .046, respectively); the response rate for desvenlafaxine 200 mg/day was 45% (p = .142). Remission rates were significantly greater for desvenlafaxine 400 mg/day (32%) versus placebo (19%; p = .035); remission rates were 30% for desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day (p = .093) and 28% for desvenlafaxine 200 mg/day (p = .126). Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity results were significant for desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day versus placebo (p = .002), but not for the higher doses. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea, insomnia, somnolence, dry mouth, dizziness, sweating, nervousness, anorexia, constipation, asthenia, and abnormal ejaculation/orgasm.

Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine is effective and well tolerated in the short-term treatment of MDD.

Volume: 68

Quick Links:

Continue Reading…

Subscribe to read the entire article


Buy this Article as a PDF