This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.


Long-Term Outcome of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Adults: A Meta-Analysis

Eesha Sharma, MD; Kandavel Thennarasu, PhD; and Y. C. Janardhan Reddy, MD

Published: September 25, 2014

Article Abstract

Objective: To study the long-term rate and predictors of remission in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), using meta-analysis.

Data Sources: The MEDLINE database was searched to May 2013 using the search terms obsessive-compulsive disorder, prospective, outcome study, clinical course, remission, prognosis, follow-up, and long-term and limits for language (English), species (humans), and age (adults). This was supplemented by manual bibliographic cross-referencing.

Study Selection: English-language studies from peer-reviewed journals on adults with DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, DSM-IV-TR, ICD-9, or ICD-10 diagnosis of OCD followed up for ≥ 1 year and treated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors and/or cognitive-behavioral therapy that reported rate of remission (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale [YBOCS] score < 16 at longest follow-up) were included.

Data Extraction: Data were gathered as numbers/means/
percentages/categories on sample size, study design, follow-up duration, age at assessment, illness duration, age at illness onset, gender, marital status, inpatient/outpatient status, family history, baseline YBOCS score, comorbidities, and remission.

Results: Seventeen studies (pooled N = 1,265) fit the selection criteria and were used for the meta-analysis. The pooled sample had a mean follow-up duration 4.91 years and was predominantly male and outpatient and had onset of illness in the second decade, illness duration more than 10 years, and moderate-to-severe OCD. Pooled remission rate was 53% (95% CI, 42%-65%). Prospective studies showed higher pooled remission rate than retrospective studies (55% [95% CI, 45%-65%] vs 50% [95% CI, 27%-73%], P < .001). Indian studies showed higher pooled remission rate than others (71% [95% CI, 59%-83%] vs 48% [95% CI, 37%-59%], P < .001). Age at onset (t = −7.08, P = .019), illness duration (t = −8.13, P = .015), baseline YBOCS score (t = −6.81,P = .021), and male gender (t = −5.92, P = .027) had significant negative association with remission on meta-regression.

Conclusion: A high long-term remission rate found in this meta-analysis is contrary to generally held beliefs about poor outcome of individuals with OCD. Multicenter, prospective, long-term studies should systematically examine course and outcome in larger samples, emphasizing symptomatic and functional recovery.

Volume: 75

Quick Links:

Continue Reading…

Subscribe to read the entire article


Buy this Article as a PDF