This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Original Research

Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telehealth Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia Compared to In-Person Care

Philip Gehrman, PhDa,b,c,*; Paul Gunter, MSa; James Findley, PhDd; Rosemarie Frasso, PhDe; Aalim M. Weljie, PhDc,f; Samuel T. Kuna, MDb,c,d; and Matthew S. Kayser, MD, PhDa,c

Published: August 24, 2021


Objective: Insomnia is prevalent and is associated with a range of negative sequelae. Cognitive behavioral treatment for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended intervention, but availability is limited. Telehealth provides increased access, but its efficacy is not certain. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of CBT-I delivered by telehealth to in-person treatment and to a waitlist control.

Methods: Individuals with DSM-5 insomnia disorder (n = 60) were randomized to telehealth CBT-I, in-person CBT-I, or 8-week waitlist control. CBT-I was delivered over 6–8 weekly sessions by video telehealth or in-person in an outpatient clinic. Follow-up assessments were at 2 weeks and 3 months posttreatment. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was the primary outcome. Change in ISI score was compared between the CBT-I group in an intent-to-treat, noninferiority analysis using an a priori margin of −3.0 points. All analyses were conducted using mixed-effects models. Data collection occurred from November 2017–July 2020.

Results: The mean (SD) change in ISI score from baseline to 3-month follow-up was −7.8 (6.1) points for in-person CBT-I, −7.5 (6.9) points for telehealth, and −1.6 (2.1) for waitlist, and the difference between the CBT-I groups was not statistically significant (t28 = −0.98, P = .33). The lower confidence limit of this between-group difference in the mean ISI changes was greater than the a priori margin of −3.0 points, indicating that telehealth treatment was not inferior to in-person treatment. There were significant improvements on most secondary outcome measures but no group differences.

Conclusions: Telehealth CBT-I may produce clinically significant improvements in insomnia severity that are noninferior to in-person treatment. CBT-I is also associated with significant gains across a range of domains of functioning. Telehealth is a promising option for increasing access to treatment without loss of clinical gains.

Trial Registration: identifier: NCT03328585

Volume: 82

Quick Links:

Continue Reading…

Subscribe to read the entire article


Buy this Article as a PDF