Systematic Review April 18, 2024

Unlocking Therapeutic Potential: The Role of Theta Burst Stimulation in Multiple Sclerosis Management

; ; ; ; ; ;

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(2):23r03645

Abstract

Objective: Current therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) often have limited efficacy and side effects, necessitating alternative approaches. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), such as transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), offers potential solutions. Among NIBS techniques, theta burst stimulation (TBS) is notable for its ability to modulate cortical activity. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the impact of TBS on MS symptoms.

Data Sources: The study conducted rigorous systematic searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases up to June 2023, using specific Medical Subject Headings terms related to NIBS and MS, such as TMS and TBS, in conjunction with terms like MS or demyelinating disease. Additionally, the bibliographic references of included studies, book chapters, and original articles were manually reviewed.

Study Selection: The study selection process involved a 2-tiered screening mechanism, beginning with an evaluation of titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review of selected articles. Inclusion criteria incorporated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on TBS with MS patients. Exclusion criteria included non-qualitative, non-MS, and non-TBS studies. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the 2008 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Scale for RCTs.

Data Extraction: Data extraction was conducted by thoroughly reviewing each research article and systematically recording the relevant information using a standardized data extraction form, ensuring consistency and accuracy throughout the process.

Results: In a systematic review encompassing 5 randomized controlled trials involving 117 individuals with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS across Italy, France, and Russia, various forms of TBS were applied. These interventions ranged from intermittent TBS (iTBS) to continuous intermittent TBS (c-iTBS) that demonstrated favorable outcomes. Notably, TBS interventions led to significant reductions in spasticity, fatigue, and pain, with c-iTBS combined with vestibular rehabilitation showing additional improvements in vestibular-ocular reflexes, gait, and balance. While specific protocols varied among the studies, collectively, the results suggest promise for TBS approaches in alleviating MS-related symptoms.

Conclusions: The findings of this review suggest that TBS may hold promise in addressing specific MS symptoms, notably fatigue and spasticity. Future research should include a more diverse participant pool to explore TBS effects across different MS subtypes and aim for larger sample sizes to enhance statistical power and result reliability.

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(2):23r03645

Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

  1. Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF, Calabresi PA. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):169–180. PubMed CrossRef
  2. Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis – a review. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(1):27–40. PubMed CrossRef
  3. Zhou X, Li K, Chen S, et al. Clinical application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:902658. PubMed CrossRef
  4. Talanki Manjunatha R, Habib S, Sangaraju SL, et al. Multiple sclerosis: therapeutic strategies on the horizon. Cureus. 2022;14(5):e24895. PubMed CrossRef
  5. Gajofatto A, Benedetti MD. Treatment strategies for multiple sclerosis: when to start, when to change, when to stop? World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(7):545–555. PubMed CrossRef
  6. Naro A, Milardi D, Russo M, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation, a tool to revert maladaptive plasticity in neuropathic pain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:376. PubMed CrossRef
  7. Ghosh S. Improvement of gait and balance by non-invasive brain stimulation: its use in rehabilitation. Expert Rev Neurother. 2019;19(2):133–144. PubMed CrossRef
  8. O’Connell NE, Marston L, Spencer S, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3(3):CD008208. PubMed
  9. Tavakoli AV, Yun K. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) mechanisms and protocols. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:214. PubMed CrossRef
  10. Thair H, Holloway AL, Newport R, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a beginner’s guide for design and implementation. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:641. PubMed CrossRef
  11. Chung CLH, Mak MKY, Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation promotes gait training in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. 2020;88(5):933–945. PubMed CrossRef
  12. Stoby KS, Rafique SA, Oeltzschner G, et al. Continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation to the visual cortex do not alter GABA and glutamate concentrations measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain Behav. 2022;12(2):e2478. PubMed CrossRef
  13. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, et al. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005;45(2):201–206. PubMed CrossRef
  14. Siebner HR, Funke K, Aberra AS, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: what is stimulated? – a consensus and critical position paper. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022;140:59–97. PubMed CrossRef
  15. Reithler J, Peters JC, Sack AT. Multimodal transcranial magnetic stimulation: using concurrent neuroimaging to reveal the neural network dynamics of noninvasive brain stimulation. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;94(2):149–165. PubMed CrossRef
  16. Kricheldorff J, Göke K, Kiebs M, et al. Evidence of neuroplastic changes after transcranial magnetic, electric, and deep brain stimulation. Brain Sci. 2022;12(7):929. PubMed CrossRef
  17. Li S, Zhang Q, Zheng S, et al. Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive and motor functions in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1091252. PubMed CrossRef
  18. Alashram AR, Janada Q, Ghrear T. Noninvasive brain stimulation for spasticity rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PM R. 2024;16(3):268–277. PubMed CrossRef
  19. Su D, Wang A, Zhu M, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of limb spasticity following multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2023;56:e12708. PubMed CrossRef
  20. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. PubMed CrossRef
  21. Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons; 2008:187–241. CrossRef
  22. Mori F, Codecà C, Kusayanagi H, et al. Effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation on spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(2):295–300. PubMed CrossRef
  23. Mori F, Ljoka C, Magni E, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation primes the effects of exercise therapy in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2011;258(7):1281–1287. PubMed CrossRef
  24. Boutière C, Rey C, Zaaraoui W, et al. Improvement of spasticity following intermittent theta burst stimulation in multiple sclerosis is associated with modulation of resting-state functional connectivity of the primary motor cortices. Mult Scler. 2017;23(6):855–863. PubMed
  25. Korzhova J, Bakulin I, Sinitsyn D, et al. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intermittent theta-burst stimulation for spasticity management in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(4):680-e44. PubMed CrossRef
  26. Tramontano M, Grasso MG, Soldi S, et al. Cerebellar intermittent theta-burst stimulation combined with vestibular rehabilitation improves gait and balance in patients with multiple sclerosis: a preliminary double-blind randomized controlled trial. Cerebellum. 2020;19(6):897–901. PubMed CrossRef