Abstract
Objective: Proactive consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry aims to meet the mental health needs of medical-surgical populations—many of which go unmet by the conventional C-L model—through systematic screening and integrated care. We implemented an automated screening list to enhance case identification of an existing proactive C-L service and evaluated service metrics along with clinician- and patient-reported outcomes.
Methods: Service outcomes were evaluated using historical and contemporary comparison data. Adjusted difference-in-difference analyses were used to determine change in consult characteristics, mean length of stay (LOS), and scores on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS). Practitioners and nurses were surveyed regarding service satisfaction, perceived safety, and burnout.
Results: During the intervention, the consult rate was 3-fold higher than at baseline. Change in time to consultation was equivocal. Overall mean LOS was not reduced, but observed LOS was 1.2 days shorter than expected among non-COVID patients receiving psychiatric consultation (P = not significant). Mean patient-rated hospital satisfaction on HCAHPS was 1 point higher on intervention units during the intervention. Surveys revealed broad satisfaction with this model among practitioners and improved perception of safety among nurses.
Conclusions: Proactive C-L psychiatry enhanced by automated screening was associated with improved service utilization and evidence suggestive of LOS reduction among those most likely to receive direct benefit from this model of care. Further, both patient and clinician ratings were improved during the intervention. Proactive C-L psychiatry provides benefits to patients, clinicians, and health systems and may be poised to achieve the Triple Aim in health care.
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2024;26(2):23m03647
Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.
Free Access: Please Log In
This content is completely free—but you need to be logged in to read the full article. If you already have an account, please log in below. Otherwise, register for free to unlock instant access.
References (28)
- Desan PH, Zimbrean PC, Weinstein AJ, et al. Proactive psychiatric consultation services reduce length of stay for admissions to an inpatient medical team. Psychosomatics. 2011;52(6):513–520. PubMed CrossRef
- van Niekerk M, Walker J, Hobbs H, et al. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in general hospital inpatients: a systematic umbrella review. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2022;63(6):567–578. PubMed CrossRef
- Bourgeois JA, Kremen WS, Servis ME, et al. The impact of psychiatric diagnosis on length of stay in a university medical center in the managed care era. Psychosomatics. 2005;46(5):431–439. PubMed CrossRef
- Oldham MA, Walsh P, Maeng DD, et al. Integration of a proactive, multidisciplinary mental health team on hospital medicine improves provider and nursing satisfaction. J Psychosom Res. 2020;134:110112. PubMed CrossRef
- Oldham MA, Desan PH, Lee HB, et al; Council on Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Proactive consultation-liaison psychiatry: American Psychiatric Association resource document. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021;62(2):169–185. PubMed CrossRef
- Kugler J, Key R, Murthy S, et al. The C-L Psychiatrist as Expert in Value-based Care Models: Three Diverse C-L Led Initiatives for Increasing Access to Care and Improving Treatment Outcomes. CLP 2018: The Annual Meeting of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Orlando, FL; 2018.
- Chen KY, Evans R, Larkins S. Why are hospital doctors not referring to consultation-liaison psychiatry? A systemic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):390. PubMed CrossRef
- Oldham MA, Chahal K, Lee HB. A systematic review of proactive psychiatric consultation on hospital length of stay. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019;60:120–126. PubMed CrossRef
- Camus V, Viret C, Porchet A, et al. Effect of changing referral mode to C-L psychiatry for noncognitively impaired medical inpatients with emotional disorders. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54(6):579–585. PubMed CrossRef
- Strain JJ, Lyons JS, Hammer JS, et al. Cost offset from a psychiatric consultation-liaison intervention with elderly hip fracture patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(8):1044–1049. PubMed CrossRef
- Sledge WH, Gueorguieva R, Desan P, et al. Multidisciplinary proactive psychiatric consultation service: impact on length of stay for medical inpatients. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(4):208–216. PubMed CrossRef
- Oldham MA, Lang VJ, Hopkin JL, et al. Proactive integration of mental health care in hospital medicine: PRIME medicine. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021;62(6):606–616. PubMed CrossRef
- Finn CT, Thakur D, Shea KM, et al. Electronic medical record reporting enhances proactive psychiatric consultation. Psychosomatics. 2018;59(6):561–566. PubMed CrossRef
- Mazurenko O, Collum T, Ferdinand A, et al. Predictors of hospital patient satisfaction as measured by HCAHPS: a systematic review. J Healthc Manag. 2017;62(4):272–283. PubMed CrossRef
- Bullock AJ, Sorbello A, Gilrain KL, et al. Patient satisfaction with a psychology consultation-liaison service at an academic medical center. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022;29(4):717–726. PubMed CrossRef
- Schmocker RK, Holden SE, Vang X, et al. The number of inpatient consultations is negatively correlated with patient satisfaction in patients with prolonged hospital stays. Am J Surg. 2016;212(2):282–288. PubMed CrossRef
- Oldham MA, Heaney B, Gleber C, et al. Using discrete form data in the electronic medical record to predict the likelihood of psychiatric consultation. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 17: S2667-2960(23)00132-5. PubMed CrossRef
- Sledge WH, Bozzo JE, White-McCullum BA, et al. The cost-benefit from the perspective of the hospital of a proactive psychiatric consultation service on inpatient general medicine services. Health Econ Outcome Res Open Access. 2016;2(4):122.
- NEJM Catalyst. What is patient flow? NEJM Catal. 2018;4(1).
- Galanis P, Vraka I, Fragkou D, et al. Nurses’ burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(8):3286–3302. PubMed CrossRef
- Pannick S, Davis R, Ashrafian H, et al. Effects of interdisciplinary team care interventions on general medical wards: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(8):1288–1298. PubMed CrossRef
- Kathol RG, Kunkel EJ, Weiner JS, et al. Psychiatrists for medically complex patients: bringing value at the physical health and mental health/substance-use disorder interface. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(2):93–107. PubMed CrossRef
- Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573–576. PubMed CrossRef
- Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759–769. PubMed CrossRef
- Bui M, Thom RP, Hurwitz S, et al. Hospital length of stay with a proactive psychiatric consultation model in the medical intensive care unit: a prospective cohort analysis. Psychosomatics. 2018. PubMed CrossRef
- Toynbee M, Walker J, Clay F, et al. The effectiveness of inpatient consultation-liaison psychiatry service models: a systematic review of randomized trials. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021;71:11–19. PubMed CrossRef
- Walker J, Burke K, Toynbee M, et al. The HOME Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing the addition of proactive psychological medicine to usual care, with usual care alone, on the time spent in hospital by older acute hospital inpatients. Trials. 2019;20(1):483. PubMed CrossRef
- Siddiqui ZK, Wu AW, Kurbanova N, et al. Comparison of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient satisfaction scores for specialty hospitals and general medical hospitals: confounding effect of survey response rate. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(9):590–593. PubMed CrossRef
Please sign in or purchase this PDF for $40.
Save
Share
Cite
