ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the impact of masks and plastic partitions on patient-doctor communication and subjective anxiety for infection in patients with psychiatric disorders.
Methods: Subjects were patients who visited a psychiatric clinic in Japan from April 27 to August 31, 2020. Anxiety of being infected and the psychological barrier to communication were evaluated on a 5-point scale.
Results: The final analysis included 425 patients. Most participants answered that there was no change with regard to communication when the doctor was wearing a mask (n = 353, 91.0%) or using a plastic partition (n = 318, 82.8%). Most participants responded that anxiety for being infected was very mild, a little mild, or not changed by the doctor wearing a mask and using a plastic partition. Most participants felt significantly less anxiety with the doctor wearing a mask/using a plastic partition before than after the state of emergency declaration (P = .005 for mask and P < .001 for plastic partition). Participants in the older age range felt significantly higher anxiety compared to those in the younger and middle age range groups from doctors wearing masks (P < .001) and compared to those in the middle age range group from plastic partitions (P = .001).
Conclusions: Use of masks and plastic partitions in psychiatric practice is recommended, as it may result in reduction of anxiety for infection without affecting patient-doctor communication in patients with psychiatric disorders. The generalizability of the results of the present study should be tested.
Free Access: Please Log In
This content is completely free—but you need to be logged in to read the full article. If you already have an account, please log in below. Otherwise, register for free to unlock instant access.
References (10)
- Daly M, Sutin AR, Robinson E. Longitudinal changes in mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study [published online ahead of print November 13, 2020] . Psychol Med. PubMed CrossRef
- Taquet M, Luciano S, Geddes JR, et al. Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62,354 COVID-19 cases in the USA. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(2):130–140. PubMed CrossRef
- Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Fluckiger C, et al. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. In: Norcross JC, ed. Psychotherapy Relationships That Work. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011:25–69.
- Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, et al; COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1973–1987. PubMed CrossRef
- Coles NA, Larsen JT, Lench HC. A meta-analysis of the facial feedback literature: effects of facial feedback on emotional experience are small and variable. Psychol Bull. 2019;145(6):610–651. PubMed CrossRef
- Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model. Commun Monogr. 1992;59(4):329–349. CrossRef
- Planchuelo-Gómez Á, Odriozola-González P, Irurtia MJ, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of the COVID-19 crisis in Spain. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:842–849. PubMed CrossRef
- Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, et al. A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:40–48. PubMed CrossRef
- Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I, et al. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(6):669–677. PubMed CrossRef
- Japanese Ministry of Labour and Welfare. Patient survey. 2017. Accessed June 15, 2021. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/stat-search/file-download?statInfId=000031790631&fileKind=1
Please sign in or purchase this PDF for $40.
Save
Share
Cite
