The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Original Research October 21, 2026

From Hospital to Outpatient Care After Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Initiation in Bipolar Disorder: Nationwide Evidence From Taiwan

; ; ; ; ; ; ;

J Clin Psychiatry 2026;87(4):26m16479

Abstract

Objective: Second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (SGA-LAIs) are increasingly used in bipolar disorder (BD), yet population-level evidence is limited on whether LAI initiation is associated with changes in real-world health care utilization that may reflect improved continuity of care within single-payer systems.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective mirror-image study using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance data. Individuals with BD who initiated an SGA-LAI between 2015 and 2024 were identified. Psychiatric outpatient visits and expenditures, emergency department (ED) visits and expenditures, inpatient admissions, length of stay, and inpatient expenditures were compared during the 12 months before and after the index injection. Stable use was defined as meeting or exceeding label-specified injection frequency for at least 12 months and was analyzed as an implementation-oriented indicator of sustained engagement with LAI-based care.

Results: Among 17,513 SGA-LAI initiators, 2,937 met analytic criteria for BD, and 500 stable users were included in the final utilization and cost analyses. After SGA-LAI initiation, both stable and nonstable users showed increased psychiatric outpatient engagement and higher outpatient expenditures, together with reduced ED utilization and lower inpatient use. The shift from acute to ambulatory care was greater among stable users.

Conclusion: In BD patients within Taiwan’s single-payer system, SGA-LAI initiation was associated with a shift from acute-care utilization toward ambulatory follow-up. Differences by stable use or LAI agent should be interpreted as implementation-related patterns of sustained engagement with LAI-based care, rather than as a direct head-to-head comparison of pharmacologic efficacy or evidence of superior intrinsic drug effects. Reduced acute-care use may suggest less relapse-related service use, but relapse was not directly measured.

J Clin Psychiatry 2026;87(4):26m16479

Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

From the Editors

Members Only Content

This full article is available exclusively to Professional tier members. Subscribe now to unlock the HTML version and gain unlimited access to our entire library plus all PDFs. If you're already a subscriber, please log in below to continue reading.

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Log in

  1. Scott J, Pope M. Nonadherence with mood stabilizers: prevalence and predictors. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(5):384–390. PubMed
  2. Gutiérrez-Rojas L, Jurado D, Martínez-Ortega JM, et al. Poor adherence to treatment associated with a high recurrence in a bipolar disorder outpatient sample. J Affect Disord. 2010;127(1-3):77–83. PubMed CrossRef
  3. Jawad I, Watson S, Haddad PM, et al. Medication nonadherence in bipolar disorder: a narrative review. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2018;8(12):349–363. PubMed CrossRef
  4. Hong J, Reed C, Novick D, et al. Clinical and economic consequences of medication non-adherence in the treatment of patients with a manic/mixed episode of bipolar disorder: results from the european Mania in Bipolar Longitudinal Evaluation of Medication (EMBLEM) study. Psychiatry Res. 2011;190(1):110–114. PubMed CrossRef
  5. Prajapati AR, Scott S, Dima AL, et al. A qualitative investigation of the modifiable determinants of medication adherence in bipolar disorder (BD): views of patients and their family and friends. J Affect Disord. 2025;382:462–470. PubMed CrossRef
  6. Cohen B, Sixsmith A, Pollock Star A, et al. Direct and indirect predictors of medication adherence with bipolar disorder: path analysis. JMIR Form Res. 2023;7:e44059. PubMed CrossRef
  7. Sajatovic M, Valenstein M, Blow FC, et al. Treatment adherence with antipsychotic medications in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2006;8(3):232–241. PubMed CrossRef
  8. Fung VC, Overhage LN, Sylvia LG, et al. Complex polypharmacy in bipolar disorder: side effect burden, adherence, and response predictors. J Affect Disord. 2019;257:17–22. PubMed CrossRef
  9. Vieta E, Tohen M, McIntosh D, et al. Early use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in bipolar disorder type I: an expert consensus. Bipolar Disord. 2025;27(1):7–16. PubMed CrossRef
  10. Bartoli F, Callovini T, Cavaleri D, et al. Effect of long-acting injectable antipsychotics on 1-year hospitalization in bipolar disorder: a mirror-image study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023;273(7):1579–1586. PubMed CrossRef
  11. Greene M, Yan T, Chang E, et al. Medication adherence and discontinuation of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. J Med Econ. 2018;21(2):127–134. PubMed CrossRef
  12. Keramatian K, Chakrabarty T, Yatham LN. Long-acting injectable second-generation/atypical antipsychotics for the management of bipolar disorder: a systematic review. CNS Drugs. 2019;33(5):431–456. PubMed CrossRef
  13. Kishi T, Oya K, Iwata N. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics for prevention of relapse in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;19(9):pyw038. PubMed CrossRef
  14. Tien Y, Huang HP, Chan CH, et al. Addition of long-acting injectable antipsychotics during manic episodes in bipolar disorder: a retrospective analysis of rehospitalizations. J Affect Disord. 2025;373:325–332. PubMed CrossRef
  15. Hsieh MH, Chuang PY, Wu CS, et al. Bipolar patients treated with long-acting injectable risperidone in Taiwan: a 1-year mirror-image study using a national claims database. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:327–334. PubMed CrossRef
  16. Lin C, Lin YP, Park SC, et al. Long-acting injectable antipsychotic use in patients with bipolar disorder: findings from the REAP-BD study. Asian J Psychiatr. 2025;103:104338. PubMed CrossRef
  17. Hsiao WC, Cheng S-H, Yip W. What can be achieved with a single-payer NHI system: the case of Taiwan. Soc Sci Med. 2019;233:265–271. PubMed CrossRef
  18. Lin LY, Warren-Gash C, Smeeth L, et al. Data resource profile: the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Epidemiol Health. 2018;40:e2018062. PubMed CrossRef
  19. Collaborators GBDMD. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):137–150. PubMed CrossRef
  20. Lai J, Li S, Wei C, et al. Mapping the global, regional and national burden of bipolar disorder from 1990 to 2019: trend analysis on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Br J Psychiatry. 2024;224(2):36–46. PubMed CrossRef
  21. Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, Parikh SV, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2018;20(2):97–170. PubMed CrossRef
  22. Dahabreh IJ, Kent DM. Index event bias as an explanation for the paradoxes of recurrence risk research. JAMA. 2011;305(8):822–823. PubMed CrossRef
  23. Morton V, Torgerson DJ. Regression to the mean: treatment effect without the intervention. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(1):59–65. PubMed CrossRef
  24. Kishi T, Citrome L, Sakuma K, et al. A comparison of recurrence rates after discontinuation of second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectable versus corresponding oral antipsychotic in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2024;333:115761. PubMed CrossRef
Buy PDF for $40

Please sign in or purchase this PDF for $40.