Abstract
Objective: Internet gaming disorder (IGD) has gained increasing global recognition, yet little is known about how health care providers perceive and manage this condition in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to assess health care providers’ IGD-related beliefs, familiarity with diagnostic criteria, confidence in diagnosis and management, and perceived training needs.
Methods:A cross-sectional online survey of internal medicine and psychiatry health care providers was conducted between September and October 2025 at a large academic medical center, assessing IGD-related beliefs, familiarity with diagnostic criteria, confidence in diagnosis and management, and perceived training needs.
Results: Among 67 respondents, most participants endorsed IGD as a clinically significant condition (84%) that contributes to psychiatric comorbidities (87%). However, fewer than half of providers reported confidence diagnosing (44%) or managing IGD (29%), and only 37% were familiar with currently proposed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria. Psychiatric health care providers reported greater confidence and familiarity with IGD than their internal medicine counterparts, particularly in diagnosis, management, and identification of diagnostic criteria during clinical encounters. Overall, 81% of participants indicated that they would benefit from additional IGD-related education.
Conclusion: Despite broad recognition of IGD’s clinical significance, substantial gaps remain in provider confidence and familiarity with diagnostic and management approaches, particularly outside of psychiatry. These findings identify actionable gaps in provider preparedness and highlight the need for targeted educational efforts to support effective clinical management of IGD across medical specialties.
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2026;28(4):26m04192
Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.
From the Editors
Are you a healthcare provider?
Add your NPI to personalize your JCP experience.
Members Only Content
This full article is available exclusively to Professional tier members. Subscribe now to unlock the HTML version and gain unlimited access to our entire library plus all PDFs. If you're already a subscriber, please log in below to continue reading.
References (12)
- Castro-Calvo J, King DL, Stein DJ, et al. Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: an international Delphi study. Addiction. 2021;116(9):2463–2475. PubMed CrossRef
- Musetti A, Floros G, Chiappedi M, et al. Gaming disorder in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision: the state of the game. BMC Psychiatry. 2025;25(1):1114. PubMed
- Mestre-Bach G, Fernandez-Aranda F, Jiménez-Murcia S. Exploring internet gaming disorder: an updated perspective of empirical evidence (2016–2021). Compr Psychiatry. 2022;116:152319. PubMed
- Amendola S, Bernath J, Presaghi F, et al. Bidirectional relationship between gaming disorder, internalizing psychopathology, psychological distress, and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Affect Disord. 2025;383:480–493. PubMed CrossRef
- Rahul R, R TK, M SM, et al. Impact of internet gaming disorder on mental well-being: prevalence and psychological distress among adolescents and young adults. Psychiatry Res. 2025;349:116512. PubMed CrossRef
- Nunes EV, Kunz K, Galanter M, et al. Addiction psychiatry and addiction medicine: the evolution of addiction physician specialists. Am J Addict. 2020;29(5):390–400. PubMed CrossRef
- Rozenman M, Patarino KM. Pediatric anxiety in practice: a knowledge and needs assessment of pediatricians and nurses. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2020;41(8):605–611. PubMed CrossRef
- Starcevic V. Internet gaming disorder: inadequate diagnostic criteria wrapped in a constraining conceptual model. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(2):110–113. PubMed CrossRef
- Jo YS, Bhang SY, Choi JS, et al. Clinical characteristics of internet gaming disorder: comparison of DSM-5 IGD and ICD-11 GD diagnoses. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):945. PubMed CrossRef
- Razum J, Baumgartner B, Glavak-Tkalić R. Psychometric validity and the appropriateness of tolerance as a criterion for internet gaming disorder: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2023;101:102256. PubMed CrossRef
- Ko CH, Lin HC, Lin PC, et al. Validity, functional impairment, and complications related to internet gaming disorder in DSM-5 and gaming disorder in ICD-11. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020;54(7):707–718. PubMed CrossRef
- Müller KW, Beutel ME, Dreier M, et al. Clinical evaluation of DSM-5 criteria for internet gaming disorder and applicability to other internet-related disorders. J Behav Addict. 2019;8(1):16–24. PubMed
